Pages

Thursday, 19 September 2013

Sony expects to sell 5M PlayStation 4s by March 2014

Sony hopes to sell 5 million PlayStation 4 game consoles by the end of this fiscal year, which ends on March 31 2014.

PlayStation 4
The PlayStation 4.
(Credit: Sony)
TOKYO -- Sony has a sales target of 5 million PlayStation 4 game consoles by next March, Sony Computer Entertainment President Andrew House said a keynote Thursday during the Tokyo Game Show
March 31, 2014, marks the end of Sony's current fiscal year, and by then, the PS4 would have been launched in most major markets. The game console will be available in North America and Europe in November this year, parts of Asia in December, and finally in Japan in February.
Sony said in late August that 1 million preorders had already been placed. This number would have increased by now, and the combined sales from Japan and other Asia markets should contribute significantly in helping Sony reach this target.
The Microsoft Xbox One will also arrive in November but will be launched in fewer countries initially compared with the PS4. So far, 13 countries have gotten a firm November 22 release date, but details for Japan and other Asia markets have not been revealed.

BlackBerry confirms BBM on Android Saturday, iOS Sunday

BlackBerry's messaging service finally gets on multiple platforms.
At its annual conference in May, BlackBerry announced that BBM would go cross-platform.
At its annual conference in May, BlackBerry announced that BBM would go cross-platform.
(Credit: Brian Bennett/CNET)
BlackBerry confirmed on Wednesday that its messenger service would come to Android and iOS this weekend.

A report had BBM coming to Android on Friday and iOS on Saturday. It turns out, it was a day off. The Android version will come on Saturday, while the iOS version hits the App Store on Sunday.
BBM was previously exclusive to BlackBerry users, and is much loved by the BlackBerry faithful. But by expanding it across platforms, BlackBerry is looking to take over the likes of WhatsApp, which has garnered more than 300 million users.
BlackBerry has attempted to rebrand BBM as more than a messaging service, positioning it as more of a social network.
It's been a busy day for BlackBerry, which introduced the BlackBerry Z30 smartphone earlier on Wednesday. The Wall Street Journal reported that it may cut up to 40 percent of its workforce by the end of the year.

Related stories


Zuckerberg: Thanks NSA, now people trust Facebook even less

It's not just Facebook. The trust metrics for all major Internet companies have gone down since the NSA scandal broke, says the social network's CEO.
mark-zuckerberg(Credit: Screenshot by Jennifer Van Grove/CNET)
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted Wednesday that the social network and its competitors are suffering in the perception department after stories of the National Security Agency's various spying initiatives, starting with Prism, came to light.
Zuckerberg, speaking in an interview with Atlantic Editor in Chief James Bennet, said that his company tracks people's trust in Facebook and every major Internet company it deems relevant. The trust metrics for Facebook, Twitter, and Google have all gone down since the NSA scandal first broke, he said.
"There's a lot of times where ... someone will criticize us in the press over privacy. What we've found is that stuff tends to not actually move the needle that much on the brand perception around trust," he said. "The NSA stuff did."
Though seemingly contradictory, Zuckerberg noted that member engagement behaviors such as sharing, liking, and commenting have not been affected by the scandal. People may trust Facebook less, but they're still using the social network just as frequently as they always have.
The Facebook chief's speaking engagement came a week after an appearance at TechCrunch Disrupt where he said that the NSA "blew it" on communication. Wednesday, Zuckerberg repeated many of the same talking points around pushing for more government transparency.

Separately, the social network's head honcho addressed another perception problem: that Facebook isn't cool. Instead of trying to convince us otherwise, Zuckerberg likened the service to electricity, which he said "maybe" was "cool when it first came out, but pretty quickly people stopped talking about it because it's not the new thing."
The thing to track instead, he said, is whether people still turn on their lights.
"People assume that we're trying to be cool. That's never been my goal," Zuckerberg said while laughing. "I'm think I'm the least cool person there is."
The point of the comments, of course, were to ease the concerns of investors and company watchers who may fear that Facebook is losing cool points with teens and tweens who are picking up hipper apps like Snapchat and WhatsApp.
Wednesday's appearance was coordinated with Zuckerberg's visit to Washington D.C. to lobby members of Congress on the immigration reform agenda of his political action group FWD.us. When pressed for his personal political affiliation, Zuckerberg ducked the question altogether, identifying himself instead as "pro knowledge economy."

Related posts

Saturday, 14 September 2013


Google Street View driver makes case for robo-driven cars -- he hits two buses (and a truck)

Panic? An accident? Perhaps both. In Indonesia, a (human) Street View driver loses his bearings and causes mayhem.
Dinged.
(Credit: Mginanjar/ Kaskus screenshot by Chris Matyszczyk/CNET)
One day, Google Street View cars will all be self-driving. Then, every crash will be the fault of some human who doesn't work for Google.
For now, we have to put up with the idea that there's a human at the Street View wheel who might do what humans sometimes do.
One Street View driver in Bogor, Indonesia, seems to have struggled in traffic and caused a touch of mayhem.
As the BBC reports, the driver appears to have hit a bus. Perhaps he'd espied something fascinating happening in the bus, something that Google Street View trawlers would, in future years, adore. You know, a man picking his nose or something.
However, according to the local police, the driver may then have panicked. This resulted in him hitting another bus. Oh, and a truck.
It's unclear whether anyone was hurt, but Google's Vishnu Mahmud confirmed the accident to the AFP news agency. He said: "We take incidents like this very seriously. We're working closely with local authorities to address the situation."
On Indonesia's largest online forum, Kaskus, there are images of the damaged Street View car.
They show that the front end has endured significant denting.
Some reports suggest the driver, having hit the first bus, may have been trying to make a quick getaway, which caused a touch more imprecision in his steering.
Still, one hopes that all the footage remains intact, as this would make for fascinating viewing on Google Street View

More Technically Incorrect


Magnepan's ultraskinny speakers make big, fat sound

The Magnepan Super MMG system features a pair of 4-foot-tall, 1.25-inch-thick panels, and a separate but equally svelte woofer!
The three-piece Super MMG speaker/woofer system.
(Credit: Steve Guttenberg/CNET)
Magnepan makes flat speakers, and has been perfecting the technology for more than 40 years. How flat is flat? The Super MMG three-piece system I'm looking at today is a mere 1.25 inches thick! The Super MMG floor-standing speaker is 48 inches high and 14 inches wide; the DWM Bass Panel is 19.25 inches high, 22.5 wide, and, like the speaker, just 1.25 inches thick. The Super MMG and DWM can be that thin because they don't use traditional box cabinets, cone woofers, or dome tweeters; they have "planar" flat drivers, designed and manufactured in Magnepan's factory in White Bear Lake, Minn.
Magnepan's speakers and woofers also differ from conventional speakers in the way they project sound into a room: the panels radiate from the front and rear surfaces. That's why for best sound Magnepan speakers should be at least 3 feet away from the rear wall. The DWM Bass Panels can be placed right up next to (at 90 degrees) the side walls of the room or out into the room.
The Super MMG system ($1,199) sounds verydifferent from any box speaker I've ever tested in this price class. The sound is more open and spacious, and vocals are incredibly natural, more human, and real-sounding; that was consistent with every reasonably good recording I tried. Then there's the Super MMG's clarity; it's a vivid sound that draws you in. Rickie Lee Jones' new CD, "The Devil You Know," sounded more fully developed and natural with the Super MMG than any other speakers you're going to hear for the price. Magnepan doesn't refer to the DWM as a subwoofer, it's a woofer that extends the system's low bass down to around 40Hz, but any decent sub will reach a lot farther down. So if you crave really deep, pants-flapping, room-shaking bass the DWM won't cut it.
The Super MMG is a remarkable system, but it's not for everyone. Impedance is rated at 4 ohms, and Magnepan recommends using an amplifier or receiver that has a 4-ohm power rating of 50 or more watts per channel. That requirement rules out most receivers, even fairly expensive ones, but NAD's receivers and integrated amps will have no trouble, as will Wadia's. The speakers and woofer panel are also more finicky about room placement than most box speakers; they need to be placed at least a few feet away from the wall behind them. If you crave high-impact dynamics for rock or any loud music the Super MMG probably won't be the right choice. It plays rock music fine, but lacks the visceral, chest-thumping power available from the better big-box tower speakers, like the PSB T6, though that speaker can't match the Super MMG's see-through transparency.
I thoroughly enjoyed the Super MMG -- it's so darn musical, it just sounds right, or to put it another way, it sounds less like a hi-fi reproducing music, and more like the real thing, than a lot of $1,199 speakers. When I rocked out with my Zu Audio Omen DW speakers ($999/pair), the differences were striking. First, the Omen DWs soft-to-loud dynamic jolts were far ahead of the Super MMGs'. The Omen DWs are livelier-sounding speakers. They aren't as power-hungry, and can play loud with fewer watts. Ah, but the Super MMG's big, broad, and deep soundstage was mighty impressive, and classical music was far more natural-sounding and satisfying. No speaker, at any price, gets everything right; each one has different strengths and weaknesses.
I experimented using the Super MMG panels with an old PSB Speakers Alpha SubZero i subwoofer instead of the DWM Bass Panels. The Alpha SubZero i definitely produced deeper, more powerful bass, but it couldn't achieve a smooth blend with the Super MMG panels. Most of what I like about Magnepan sound disappeared with the subwoofer in the system.
The Super MMG system is sold by Magnepan brick and mortar dealers, but if you don't have one nearby it's available factory direct. The standard MMG panel speakers (without the DWM) are still available for $600 a pair; they're a great way to get true high-end sound without breaking the bank.

Related stories


Speedy AT&T vs. reliable Verizon: The gap narrows

While Verizon Wireless remains the most reliable network, according to testing firm RootMetrics, AT&T offers a better overall mix of reliability and speed.
Consider this more fuel for the wireless ad wars.
Verizon did not like this ad.
(Credit: AT&T)
Wireless testing firm RootMetrics said AT&T edged out Verizon Wireless in the early results of its latest study, which were made available to CNET. It's a surprise call because Root had routinely crowned Verizon as the top carrier.
The study was based on a combination of speed and reliability. Verizon has long held a leadership position in reliability and continues to do so in the most recent results. But AT&T has narrowed the gap considerably, which allows its speed advantage to put it over the top.
The test, which began in July and tested 60 markets, is only about halfway done and will be completed during the course of the year. The results, characterized as a horse race by RootMetrics CEO Bill Moore, may differ when wrapped up.
Still, these kinds of kudos are increasingly important as the carriers seek ways to stand out from each other. With most of the carriers moving to the same high-speed cellular technologies, and offerings many of the same high-profile smartphones, network quality is a critical selling point.
The competitive environment has resulted in what amounts to a billion-dollar shouting match between the carriers, as each strives to tout the quality of their service. AT&T set off another war of words in July by proclaiming itself the nation's fastest and most reliable network, nabbing away the reliability claim from Verizon.
AT&T based the claim off of another, unnamed study. Verizon maintains that it is the most reliable network.
"We've always been about reliability," said a Verizon representative. "It's about needing to get on the network and staying on the network."
AT&T, unsurprisingly, was pleased with the early results.
"AT&T has the nation's fastest and most reliable 4G LTE network," said a company representative. "As the saying goes, 'it's not bragging if you can back it up.'"
AT&T's turnaround 
AT&T edging out Verizon marks a huge reversal for the carrier, which has long struggled with issues with network coverage and reliability. The problems were at their worst when AT&T had the exclusive rights to the iPhone and was overwhelmed by the deluge of traffic it brought.
Customers mocked the carrier -- with good reason -- and forced AT&T to move quickly to improve its network.
While AT&T still faces a perception issue with its network, the recent studies reflect the work and money the company has put in to improving its network. Moore said AT&T has moved up right behind Verizon in terms of reliability -- an unthinkable scenario even a few years ago.
Even as RootMetrics had Verizon as the overall leader in the first half, AT&T had gained ground, Moore said.
A number of recent studies showing the speed of its network have emboldened AT&T to pour money into a campaign touting superiority over rival Verizon. The unnamed reliability study had only convinced AT&T to push even harder.
Moore said he saw marked improvement from AT&T in the last few months. He said the call failure rate fell by 60 percent from a year ago, while data reliability improved.
RootMetrics sheds some light 
The release of the new data by RootMetrics is an attempt by the firm to shed additional light on the shadowy world of cellular tests, whose methods are often disclosed, as well as better define the terms "reliability" and "speed," two words that are used a liberally.
Verizon still claims a more reliable network.
(Credit: Verizon)
"What we're trying to do is put a stake in the ground and challenge the industry," said Moore.
Moore's point: cellular technology and services have evolved over the past decade and a half, and testing processes need to evolve with it.
"15 years ago, we were just happy that these phones worked," he said.
Reliability, for instance, used to be about whether a phone could get a signal -- any signal. But RootMetrics defines it simply as being able to do "what you want to do, when you want to do it, without interruption," holding carriers to a higher standing. For Root, reliability applies to calls, data, and text messages.
For speed, RootMetrics goes beyond testing peak speeds, and looks practically at how quickly a person can accomplish a task on a smartphone. Moore noted that some carriers with a higher peak speed actually have slower task completion times.
The results, which the firm is posting on its Web site, will include a RootScore that combines the two factors. But for the first time, the firm will also break out the individual speed and reliability scores.
The other major carriers, Sprint and T-Mobile, continued to lag behind the bigger players, particularly when it came to reliability, Moore said.
But he noted both of the smaller carriers have made significant improvements, and touted T-Mobile's non-LTE network, which runs on a technology called HSPA+, as the fastest network behind LTE.
Ultimately, Moore said he is releasing more details on the scores and definition of wireless jargon to get the process out in the open, which he believes will educate consumers and result in better network improvements.
"We're holding ourselves to a transparent standard," Moore said. "We want to be under the microscope."

Related stories


The new look for iOS 7

The new look for iOS 7
Scroll RightScroll Left
  • The new look for iOS 7
  • Alien Blue
  • Hipmunk
  • Pocket
  • Aero
  • Dots
  • Gmail
  • Google Search
  • Feedly
  • Haze
  • Yahoo Weather
  • VSCO Cam
  • Zillow
Apple's iOS 7 is coming Wednesday, September 18, featuring flattened icons and a more minimalist design, moving away from the three-dimensional candy-coated icons and skeuomorphic app treatments found in the OS since it came out in 2007. I like the new look, and with about a million third-party apps in the iTunes app store, this means that -- while they're not required to -- a lot of developers will probably update their apps to fit in with the new design scheme.
I asked a few developers whether they would be updating their design schemes and found a couple that had mockups I could use to show the differences. I also decided to go through and pick out apps for this slideshow that have similar design elements to iOS 7 -- such as flat buttons, uncluttered interfaces, or the deliberate use of white space -- to show that some developers may not need to change a thing. With that said, here are 12 apps that fit in perfectly with Apple's new iOS design

Apple's new iPhones slammed in latest Microsoft ad

Attack ad from Microsoft knocks Apple's new phones by imagining an internal meeting at Apple headquarters.
(Credit: Microsoft)
If Nokia's ribbing of Apple shortly after the new iPhone unveiling this week wasn't enough, Nokia's soon-to-be-parent-company, Microsoft, is joining the fray.
Microsoft posted a new video Friday morning knocking Apple's new iPhones and poking fun at the new colors as the only innovation.
The video is in a rather unusual style that attempts to mimic pitch meetings within Apple's inner confines. Nonspeaking characters watching the pitch appear to represent Apple's design chief, Jony Ive, and perhaps a younger version of Apple CEO Tim Cook, if he were biologically bonded to Google exec Andy Rubin.
The less than two minute video ends with a tagline: #timetoswitch, and it doesn't show off any Windows Phone devices.
The attack ad is the latest from Microsoft to target Apple's devices. Microsoft has spent the past four months going after the iPad's capabilities while promoting those found in its Surface tabletas well as other devices running Windows 8. The company is not alone: Google-owned Motorola last week began running ads that target not only the iPhone but Android too.
Update at 12:48 p.m. PT: Microsoft has made the video private. We've contacted the company to find out more.
Here's a mirrored copy of the ad:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avO5FXj7K-c&feature=player_embedded#t=102